Arevalo v. Arevalo

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 28, 2022·No. 83991·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JESUS LUIS AREVALO, No. 83991 Appellant,

vs.

CATHERINE MARIE AREVALO, N/K/A CATHERINE MARIE DELAO,

FILE

Res • ondent. JAN 8 2022 T.

ELMS A. BROWN

s E. RT

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a post-decree order denying appellant's request to file an amended opposition and countermotion. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Charles J. Hoskin, Judge.

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The order challenged on appeal does not appear to be substantively appealable. See Brown u. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, this court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

,J.

Hardesty

j. J.

Stiglich Herndon

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

I947A 44411P.

z 01s'W

cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Jesus Luis Arevalo Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF

NEYACM

1.01 19.17A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arevalo v. Arevalo, (Neb. 2022).

Arevalo v. Arevalo (Arevalo v. Arevalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC
301 P.3d 850 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)