Arevalo v. Arevalo
This text of Arevalo v. Arevalo (Arevalo v. Arevalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JESUS LUIS AREVALO, No. 83991 Appellant, vs. CATHERINE MARIE AREVALO, N/K/A CATHERINE MARIE DELAO, FILE Res • ondent. JAN 8 2022 T. ELMS A. BROWN s E. RT
DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a post-decree order denying appellant's request to file an amended opposition and countermotion. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Charles J. Hoskin, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The order challenged on appeal does not appear to be substantively appealable. See Brown u. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, this court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
,J. Hardesty
j. J. Stiglich Herndon
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
I947A 44411P. z 01s'W cc: Hon. Charles J. Hoskin, District Judge, Family Court Division Jesus Luis Arevalo Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEYACM
1.01 19.17A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Arevalo v. Arevalo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arevalo-v-arevalo-nev-2022.