Aretha Thomas v. Ameren U.E.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2020·No. 18-3506·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 18-3506

Aretha Thomas

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Ameren U.E.

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Diana Dewitt; Ed Willhite; Steve Manasco

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

Submitted: January 15, 2020 Filed: January 21, 2020

[Unpublished]

Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Aretha Thomas appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her disability-discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was proper. See United States v. Dico, Inc., 136 F.3d 572, 575 (8th Cir. 1998) (reviewing de novo the dismissal of plaintiff’s claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Thomas’s pending motions.

1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aretha Thomas v. Ameren U.E., (8th Cir. 2020).

Aretha Thomas v. Ameren U.E. (Aretha Thomas v. Ameren U.E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dico, Incorporated
136 F.3d 572 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)