Aretha Thomas v. Ameren U.E.
This text of Aretha Thomas v. Ameren U.E. (Aretha Thomas v. Ameren U.E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-3506 ___________________________
Aretha Thomas
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Ameren U.E.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
Diana Dewitt; Ed Willhite; Steve Manasco
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________
Submitted: January 15, 2020 Filed: January 21, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM. Aretha Thomas appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her disability-discrimination action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal was proper. See United States v. Dico, Inc., 136 F.3d 572, 575 (8th Cir. 1998) (reviewing de novo the dismissal of plaintiff’s claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Thomas’s pending motions. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aretha Thomas v. Ameren U.E., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aretha-thomas-v-ameren-ue-ca8-2020.