Areson v. Hempstead Bus Corp.
This text of 14 A.D.2d 790 (Areson v. Hempstead Bus Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the proof adduced, it may not be held that the evidence preponderates so greatly in favor of plaintiff as to establish that the jury’s verdict for the defendants could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (Musumeci v. Pillsbury Mills, 12 A D 2d 941; Mieuli v. New York & Queens County Ry. Co., 136 App. Div. 373). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 A.D.2d 790, 220 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/areson-v-hempstead-bus-corp-nyappdiv-1961.