Areson v. Hempstead Bus Corp.

14 A.D.2d 790, 220 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8578
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 16, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 A.D.2d 790 (Areson v. Hempstead Bus Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Areson v. Hempstead Bus Corp., 14 A.D.2d 790, 220 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

On the proof adduced, it may not be held that the evidence preponderates so greatly in favor of plaintiff as to establish that the jury’s verdict for the defendants could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (Musumeci v. Pillsbury Mills, 12 A D 2d 941; Mieuli v. New York & Queens County Ry. Co., 136 App. Div. 373). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pretto v. Leiwant
80 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.2d 790, 220 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/areson-v-hempstead-bus-corp-nyappdiv-1961.