Areson v. Hempstead Bus Corp.
14 A.D.2d 790, 220 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8578
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 16, 1961·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On the proof adduced, it may not be held that the evidence preponderates so greatly in favor of plaintiff as to establish that the jury’s verdict for the defendants could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (Musumeci v. Pillsbury Mills, 12 A D 2d 941; Mieuli v. New York & Queens County Ry. Co., 136 App. Div. 373). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Areson v. Hempstead Bus Corp., 14 A.D.2d 790, 220 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).
14 A.D.2d 790 (Areson v. Hempstead Bus Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pretto v. Leiwant
80 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)