Arends v. Ball

703 So. 2d 1062, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 19, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 4, 1998 WL 3572
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 8, 1998·No. No. 91118·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Ball v. Arends, 697 So.2d 523 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), which certified conflict with Tampa Letter Carriers, Inc. v. Mack, 649 So.2d 890 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), and Special’s Trading Co. v. International Consumer Corp., 679 So.2d 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), concerning the issue of a defendant’s entitlement to an award of an attorney’s fee after the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the complaint. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

In MX Investments, Inc. v. Crawford, 700 So.2d 640 (Fla.1997), we resolved this conflict by approving the decision of the district court below. Therefore, we approve the First District’s decision in Arends based on our decision in MX Investments.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., and GRIMES, Senior Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arends v. Ball, 703 So. 2d 1062, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 19, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 4, 1998 WL 3572 (Fla. 1998).

703 So. 2d 1062 (Arends v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Special's Trading v. Intern. Consumer
679 So. 2d 369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Tampa Letter Carriers, Inc. v. MacK
649 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
MX INVESTMENTS INC. v. Crawford
700 So. 2d 640 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Ball v. Arends
697 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)