Arends v. Ball
This text of 703 So. 2d 1062 (Arends v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have for review Ball v. Arends, 697 So.2d 523 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), which certified conflict with Tampa Letter Carriers, Inc. v. Mack, 649 So.2d 890 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), and Special’s Trading Co. v. International Consumer Corp., 679 So.2d 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), concerning the issue of a defendant’s entitlement to an award of an attorney’s fee after the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the complaint. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
In MX Investments, Inc. v. Crawford, 700 So.2d 640 (Fla.1997), we resolved this conflict by approving the decision of the district court below. Therefore, we approve the First District’s decision in Arends based on our decision in MX Investments.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
703 So. 2d 1062, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 19, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 4, 1998 WL 3572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arends-v-ball-fla-1998.