Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 832 F.3d 1355
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 11, 2016·No. 15-2069·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ARENDI S.A.R.L., Appellant

v.

APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, Cross-Appellants ______________________

2015-2069, 2015-2070, 2015-2071 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2014-00206, IPR2014-00207. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

BRUCE D. SUNSTEIN, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Tim- bers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by ROBERT M. ASHER.

JOSEPH R. PALMORE, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Wash- ington, DC, argued for cross-appellants. Cross-Appellant Apple Inc. also represented by SETH W. LLOYD, BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI; DAVID LEE FEHRMAN, MEHRAN ARJOMAND, Los Angeles, CA. ROBERT J. KENT, Turner Boyd LLP, Redwood City, CA, for cross-appellants Google Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC. Also represented by MATTHEW A. SMITH. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, LINN, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc. (Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.