Arendes v. Lee County

899 So. 2d 493, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5245, 2005 WL 856071
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 2005
DocketNo. 2D04-3728
StatusPublished

This text of 899 So. 2d 493 (Arendes v. Lee County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arendes v. Lee County, 899 So. 2d 493, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5245, 2005 WL 856071 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Appellants challenge the order dismissing several counts of their complaint against Lee County for the death of their dog. Because the order transfers the remaining claims to county court, we must treat the Appellants’ notice of appeal as a petition for writ of common law certiorari. See Rocco v. Coffey, 163 So.2d 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Kennedy v. Byas, 867 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

We deny the petition because the circuit court’s order does not depart from the essential requirements of law. See Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co., 774 So.2d 679 (Fla.2000).

Petition denied.

WHATLEY, SALCINES, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co.
774 So. 2d 679 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Kennedy v. Byas
867 So. 2d 1195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Rocco v. Coffey
163 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
899 So. 2d 493, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5245, 2005 WL 856071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arendes-v-lee-county-fladistctapp-2005.