Arendale v. Washington

104 So. 133, 213 Ala. 23, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 178
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 16, 1925·No. 8 Div. 567.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

Under the evidence before the trial court it was correctly held that the possession of Mazie Washington amounted to an ouster and disseisin of her several cotenants, initiating an adverse possession, which, having continued for more than 10 years, effected a divestiture of their title in favor of the adverse occupant. Abercrombie v. Baldwin, 15 Ala. 363; Brady v. Huff, 75 Ala. 80; Ashford v. Ashford, 136 Ala. 631, 34 So. 10, 96 Am. St. Rep. 82; Hamby v. Folsam, 148 Ala. 221, 42 So. 548.

Under the statute (Code 1907, § 2830; Code 1923, § 6069) the assessment of the lands for taxation by the adverse occupant dispensed with the necessity of color of title in her.

All other questions in the case are irrelevant, and their consideration is therefore unnecessary.

Let the decree of the circuit court be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arendale v. Washington, 104 So. 133, 213 Ala. 23, 1925 Ala. LEXIS 178 (Ala. 1925).

104 So. 133 (Arendale v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicholas v. Cousins
459 P.2d 970 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1969)
Lynch v. Jackson
177 So. 347 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)