Arena v. State
This text of 269 A.D. 873 (Arena v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by claimant from a judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing his claim upon the merits. Claimant’s attorney was not afforded a fair opportunity to prepare for trial, he was limited as to his right to call witnesses under control of the State and his right to cross-examine was unduly restricted. Judgment of the Court of Claims reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and a new trial granted. All concur, except Brewster, J., who dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arena-v-state-nyappdiv-1945.