Arena Rec Origination Fin. SPV, LLC v. Mahic

2026 NY Slip Op 31053(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedMarch 18, 2026
DocketIndex No. 655533/2025
StatusUnpublished
AuthorAndrea Masley

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 31053(U) (Arena Rec Origination Fin. SPV, LLC v. Mahic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arena Rec Origination Fin. SPV, LLC v. Mahic, 2026 NY Slip Op 31053(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2026).

Opinion

Arena Rec Origination Fin. SPV, LLC v Mahic 2026 NY Slip Op 31053(U) March 18, 2026 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 655533/2025 Judge: Andrea Masley Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.6555332025.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX036_TO.html[03/25/2026 3:45:52 PM] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/2026 04:52 PM INDEX NO. 655533/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION PART 48 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X ARENA REC ORIGINATION FINANCING SPV, LLC, INDEX NO. 655533/2025

Plaintiff, MOTION DATE -- -v- MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 001 NED MAHIC,

Defendant. DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

HON. ANDREA MASLEY:

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - SUMMARY IN LIEU OF COMPLAINT .

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - SUMMARY IN LIEU OF COMPLAINT .

In motion sequence 001, plaintiff ARENA Rec Origination Financing SPV, LLC

(ARENA) moves pursuant to CPLR 3213 for an order granting summary judgment

(a) [a]gainst defendant Ned Mahic (‘Defendant’ or ‘Guarantor’) in the amount of $13,099,270.83, representing the amount due and owing under that certain Guaranty as of September 8, 2025, and awarding Default Interest in the amount of $8,333.33 per diem from June 2, 2025 until entry of judgment and at the statutory rate pursuant to CPLR 5004 thereafter;

(b) [a]gainst Guarantor for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount to be determined, which have been incurred by Plaintiff in enforcing its rights and remedies under the Guaranty; and

(c) [a]ppointing a referee to hear and report on reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses Guarantor owes to Plaintiff.” (NYSCEF Doc. No. [NYSCEF] 2, Notice of Motion at 1.)

CPLR 3213 provides that “[w]hen an action is based upon an instrument for the

payment of money only or upon any judgment, the plaintiff may serve with the summons 655533/2025 ARENA REC ORIGINATION FINANCING SPV, LLC vs. MAHIC, NED Page 1 of 5 Motion No. 001 001

1 of 5 [* 1] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/2026 04:52 PM INDEX NO. 655533/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026

a notice of motion for summary judgment and the supporting papers in lieu of a

complaint.” (CPLR 3213.) “In order to qualify for CPLR 3213 treatment, plaintiff must

be able to establish a prima facie case by proof of the agreement and a failure to make

the payments called for thereunder.” (SCP, Inc. v Bermudatel Ltd., 224 AD2d 214, 216

[1st Dept 1996] [citations omitted].) Once the plaintiff makes a prima facie showing, “the

burden shifts to the defendant to establish, by admissible evidence, the existence of a

triable issue with respect to a bona fide defense.” (Cooperative Centrale Raiffeisen-

Boerenleenbank, B.A., “Rabobank Intl.,” NY Branch v Navarro, 25 NY3d 485, 492

[2015] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted].)

Here, plaintiff has made out its prima facie case for summary judgment pursuant

to CPLR 3213 by submitting the loan agreement (NYSCEF 5), the promissory note

(NYSCEF 6), the guaranty (NYSCEF 7; see also NYSCEF 8, Debt Service and Carry

Guaranty), and the demand letter (NYSCEF 9) and notice of default (NYSCEF 10).

(See DB 232 Seigel Mezz LLC v Moskovits, 223 AD3d 610, 611 [1st Dept 2024]

[“[p]laintiff satisfied its prima facie burden on its CPLR 3213 motion for summary

judgment in lieu of complaint by submitting the guaranties executed by defendants, the

underlying loan agreement, and its demand letters establishing the borrower's default

and defendants' failure to perform”].)

In the absence of opposition, defendant has failed to meet his burden of

establishing a bona fide defense.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint is

granted, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of ARENA and

655533/2025 ARENA REC ORIGINATION FINANCING SPV, LLC vs. MAHIC, NED Page 2 of 5 Motion No. 001 001

2 of 5 [* 2] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/2026 04:52 PM INDEX NO. 655533/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026

against Mahic in the sum of $13,099,270.83, of which $12,500,000 is the unpaid

principal balance, $443,437.50 is the default interest through September 9, 2025,

$30,833,33 is the contract interest through September 9, 2025, $125,000 is the

unreimbursed fees and expenses, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to calculate the

amount of interest from September 9, 2025 to the date of judgment; and it is further

ORDERED that the issue of the amount of attorneys’ fees owed is severed; and

it is further

ORDERED that a Judicial Hearing Officer (JHO) or Special Referee shall be

designated to hear and report to this court on the following issues:

(1) the reasonable value of legal services of ARENA’s counsel to be reimbursed

by Mahic to ARENA; and

(2) costs and expenses under the guaranty except that, in the event of and upon

the filing of a stipulation of the parties, as permitted by CPLR 4317, the

Special Referee, or another person designated by the parties to serve as

Referee, shall determine the aforesaid issues; and it is further

ORDERED that the powers of the JHO/Special Referee shall not be limited

beyond the limitations set forth in the CPLR; and it is further

ORDERED that this matter is hereby referred to the Special Referee Clerk for

placement at the earliest possible date upon the calendar of the Special Referees Part

(Part SRP), which, in accordance with the Rules of that Part (which are posted on the

website of this court), shall assign this matter at the initial appearance to an available

JHO/Special Referee to hear and report as specified above; and it is further

655533/2025 ARENA REC ORIGINATION FINANCING SPV, LLC vs. MAHIC, NED Page 3 of 5 Motion No. 001 001

3 of 5 [* 3] FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/2026 04:52 PM INDEX NO. 655533/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026

ORDERED that parties shall immediately consult one another and Reed Smith

LLP shall, within 15 days from the date of this Order, submit to the Special Referee an

Information Sheet (accessible at the “References” link on the court’s website) containing

all the information called for therein and that, as soon as practical thereafter, the Special

Referee Clerk shall advise counsel for the parties of the date fixed for the appearance of

the matter upon the calendar of the Special Referees Part; and it is further

ORDERED that on the initial appearance in the Special Referees Part the parties

shall appear for a pre-hearing conference before the assigned JHO/Special Referee

and the date for the hearing shall be fixed at that conference; the parties need not

appear at the conference with all witnesses and evidence; and it is further

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SCP (Bermuda) Inc. v. Bermudatel Ltd.
224 A.D.2d 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 31053(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arena-rec-origination-fin-spv-llc-v-mahic-nysupctnewyork-2026.