Arehart v. Division of Highways

26 Ct. Cl. 135
West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided May 3, 2007·No. CC-05-429·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted to the Court for decision upon a Stipulation entered into by claimant and respondent wherein certain facts and circumstances of the claim were agreed to as follows:

1. On October 28, 2005, claimant was traveling on Mill Creek Road in Charleston, Kanawha County, when her vehicle struck a hole in the road damaging a tire.

2. Respondent was responsible for the maintenance of Mill Creek Road, which it failed to maintain properly on the date of this incident.

3. As a result of this incident, claimant’s vehicle sustained damages totaling $137.75.

4. Respondent agrees that the amount of $137.75 for the damages put forth by the claimant is fair and reasonable.

[136] The Court has reviewed the facts of the claim and finds that respondent was negligent in its maintenance of Mill Creek Road on the date of this incident; that the negligence of respondent was the proximate cause of the damages sustained to claimant’s vehicle; and that the amount of the damages agreed to by the parties is fair and reasonable. Thus, claimant may make a recovery for her loss.

Accordingly, the Court is of the opinion to and does make an award in the amount of $137.75.

Award of $137.75.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arehart v. Division of Highways, 26 Ct. Cl. 135 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 2007).

26 Ct. Cl. 135 (Arehart v. Division of Highways) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.