Arduini v. Banco di Napoli

243 A.D. 10, 276 N.Y.S. 90, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5472
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 10 (Arduini v. Banco di Napoli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arduini v. Banco di Napoli, 243 A.D. 10, 276 N.Y.S. 90, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Surrogate’s Court has no jurisdiction to direct payment of a debt by summary order. (Matter of Brazil, 219 App. Div. 594; Matter of Thomas, 235 id. 450; Id. 455; Matter of Hammer, 237 id. 497.)

The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Stiassni
195 Misc. 668 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
Josephberg v. Cavallero
262 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
In re the Estate of Young
171 Misc. 947 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 10, 276 N.Y.S. 90, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arduini-v-banco-di-napoli-nyappdiv-1934.