Arduini v. Banco di Napoli
243 A.D. 10, 276 N.Y.S. 90, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5472
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1934·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The Surrogate’s Court has no jurisdiction to direct payment of a debt by summary order. (Matter of Brazil, 219 App. Div. 594; Matter of Thomas, 235 id. 450; Id. 455; Matter of Hammer, 237 id. 497.)
The order appealed from should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Present — Finch, P. J., Martin, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arduini v. Banco di Napoli, 243 A.D. 10, 276 N.Y.S. 90, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
243 A.D. 10 (Arduini v. Banco di Napoli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Stiassni
195 Misc. 668 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
Josephberg v. Cavallero
262 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
In re the Estate of Young
171 Misc. 947 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)