Ardolino v. Ardolino

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ardolino v. Ardolino

733 So. 2d 1047, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1893, 1999 WL 89725

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 24, 1999

DocketNo. 98-3090

StatusPublished

This text of 733 So. 2d 1047 (Ardolino v. Ardolino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ardolino v. Ardolino, 733 So. 2d 1047, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1893, 1999 WL 89725 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the record indicates that the former husband was not afforded his due process rights for the criminal contempt hearing, we reverse the portion of the order finding the former husband in criminal contempt for failure to pay court ordered alimony. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274, 1277 (Fla.1985)(holding that “potential criminal contemnors are entitled to the same constitutional due process protections afforded criminal defendants in more typical criminal proceedings.”); Pompey v. Cochran, 685 So.2d 1007, 1012-13 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The remaining issues raised by the former husband lack merit. Accordingly, we reverse in part and affirm in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the record indicates that the former husband was not afforded his due process rights for the criminal contempt hearing, we reverse the portion of the order finding the former husband in criminal contempt for failure to pay court ordered alimony. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274, 1277 (Fla.1985)(holding that “potential criminal contemnors are entitled to the same constitutional due process protections afforded criminal defendants in more typical criminal proceedings.”); Pompey v. Cochran, 685 So.2d 1007, 1012-13 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). The remaining issues raised by the former husband lack merit. Accordingly, we reverse in part and affirm in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

733 So. 2d 1047, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1893, 1999 WL 89725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ardolino-v-ardolino-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack