Ardoin v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Ardoin v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development

701 So. 2d 184, 1997 La. LEXIS 2948, 1997 WL 630730

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 3, 1997

DocketNo. 97-CC-2287

StatusPublished

This text of 701 So. 2d 184 (Ardoin v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ardoin v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development, 701 So. 2d 184, 1997 La. LEXIS 2948, 1997 WL 630730 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Transportation & Dev., Dept. of; Louisiana State of; — Defendant(s); applying [185]*185for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 30143; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW971184.

Granted. Case remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the privilege issue in light of Reichert v. State of Louisiana, 96-1419, 96-1460 (La. 5/20/97), 694 So.2d 193. Further, the award of attorney’s fees and costs is vacated and set aside. Relator had a right to assert the privilege under 23 U.S.C. See. 409 and did so in good faith.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Transportation & Dev., Dept. of; Louisiana State of; — Defendant(s); applying [185]*185for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 30143; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW971184.

Granted. Case remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the privilege issue in light of Reichert v. State of Louisiana, 96-1419, 96-1460 (La. 5/20/97), 694 So.2d 193. Further, the award of attorney’s fees and costs is vacated and set aside. Relator had a right to assert the privilege under 23 U.S.C. See. 409 and did so in good faith.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

701 So. 2d 184, 1997 La. LEXIS 2948, 1997 WL 630730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ardoin-v-state-ex-rel-department-of-transportation-development-la-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack