Ardita v. Bright
This text of 283 A.D. 874 (Ardita v. Bright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by an owner of a “ theater restaurant” for a judgment declaring that defendants, individually and as representatives of a labor union, have violated the provisions of section 340 of the General Business Law (dealing with restraint of trade), for an injunction, and money damages, plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for an injunction pendente lite. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 874, 129 N.Y.S.2d 895, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ardita-v-bright-nyappdiv-1954.