Ardis v. Schwartz

29 A.D.2d 559, 286 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2686
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1967·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 1, 1965, reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion to vacate two orders of said court, dated December 9, 1963 and September 9, 1964, respectively, and for other relief granted. The September, 1964 order dismissing the complaint was procured without compliance by defendant with CPLR 321 (subd. [c]), and should have been vacated (Tourmer v. Linden Gen., 26 A D 2d 576; YláhaMs v. Sharf, 283 App. Div. 1087). The delay in prosecuting the action was adequately explained and defendant points to no specific prejudice which would overcome the beneficial policy that controversies should be disposed of on their merits (Benadon v. Antonio, 10 A D 2d 40, 42). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ardis v. Schwartz, 29 A.D.2d 559, 286 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

29 A.D.2d 559 (Ardis v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allstate Insurance v. Phillips
128 A.D.2d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Feola v. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc.
101 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)