Arden v. Walden
1 Edw. Ch. 631, 1833 N.Y. LEXIS 188, 1833 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 26
Opinion
I consider the proceedings The defendant had a right to treat the paper as a nullity. It .is true the original subpoena had the date í but the defendant was to be guided by the copy left with him.
This is a clerical error and the defendant has had the of the delay: I shall not give costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arden v. Walden, 1 Edw. Ch. 631, 1833 N.Y. LEXIS 188, 1833 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 26 (N.Y. 1833).
1 Edw. Ch. 631 (Arden v. Walden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Von Roy v. Blackman
28 F. Cas. 1272 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, 1877)