Ardalt, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ardalt, Inc. v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 837, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1253

United States Customs Court·Decided December 14, 1966·No. No. P66/371·Published

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Ardalt, Inc. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 837, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1253 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

57 Cust. Ct. 837 (Ardalt, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.