Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.

142 S.W.2d 626
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1941 Tex. App. LEXIS 712
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 1, 1940·No. No. 11138·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The application of petitioners herein for the writ of mandamus, together with the answers of the respondents thereto, as well as the written arguments of both sides, having been this day considered by this court, and the court, after such hearing and consideration, not being clearly of opinion that — upon the facts stated in the petition — the prayed-for writ should be awarded, but, on the contrary, being of opinion that — at best — no right either upon the law or the facts is shown in the petitioners to such writ, it is hereby refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Houston Lighting & Power Co., 142 S.W.2d 626 (Tex. Ct. App. 1940).

142 S.W.2d 626 (Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.