Arcieri v. Alvis

167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 20, 1957
DocketNo. 35197
StatusPublished

This text of 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37 (Arcieri v. Alvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arcieri v. Alvis, 167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37 (Ohio 1957).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner has invoked the original jurisdiction of this court by a petition in habeas corpus to obtain his release from incarceration in the Ohio Penitentiary, in which he is serving a sentence under the Habitual Criminal Act after a jury trial and verdict of guilty. Petitioner’s contention that he is illegally confined is based on alleged errors and irregularities committed during trial. Although an adequate remedy by way of appeal was afforded petitioner to review the alleged errors complained of, which precludes his right to maintain this action, the record discloses that petitioner’s former convictions of four separate and distinct felonies of the kind specified in the Habitual Criminal Act, each felony committed at a different time, the subject of a separate prosecution and not connected in any way with the same transaction, properly constituted the basis for his conviction under the Habitual Criminal Act.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell, Taet, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 Ohio St. (N.S.) 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arcieri-v-alvis-ohio-1957.