Archstone v. Tocci Building Corp. of New Jersey, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Archstone v. Tocci Building Corp. of New Jersey, Inc.

119 A.D.3d 496, 987 N.Y.S.2d 911

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 2014

Docket2012-00678

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.3d 496 (Archstone v. Tocci Building Corp. of New Jersey, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Archstone v. Tocci Building Corp. of New Jersey, Inc., 119 A.D.3d 496, 987 N.Y.S.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of *497 contract, the defendant Tocci Building Corporation of New Jersey, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered December 5, 2011, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 for leave to renew its prior motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel the plaintiffs to comply with certain document disclosure requests, which had been denied in an order dated July 22, 2010.

Ordered that the order entered December 5, 2011, is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant Tocci Building Corporation of New Jersey, Inc. (hereinafter Tocci), for leave to renew its prior motion to compel disclosure related to a development project. While the evidence submitted on the motion to renew was unavailable at the time of the original motion, it did not contain new facts that would have changed the prior determination that the requested disclosure was not material and necessary to Tocci’s defense of the action (see CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; 3101 [a]; Andon v 302-304 Mott St. Assoc., 94 NY2d 740, 746 [2000]; Hackney v Monge, 103 AD3d 844 [2013]; Bhoj v Bargold Stor. Sys., 303 AD2d 437 [2003]).

Dillon, J.R, Dickerson, Leventhal and Austin, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of *497 contract, the defendant Tocci Building Corporation of New Jersey, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered December 5, 2011, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 for leave to renew its prior motion pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel the plaintiffs to comply with certain document disclosure requests, which had been denied in an order dated July 22, 2010.

Ordered that the order entered December 5, 2011, is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant Tocci Building Corporation of New Jersey, Inc. (hereinafter Tocci), for leave to renew its prior motion to compel disclosure related to a development project. While the evidence submitted on the motion to renew was unavailable at the time of the original motion, it did not contain new facts that would have changed the prior determination that the requested disclosure was not material and necessary to Tocci’s defense of the action (see CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; 3101 [a]; Andon v 302-304 Mott St. Assoc., 94 NY2d 740, 746 [2000]; Hackney v Monge, 103 AD3d 844 [2013]; Bhoj v Bargold Stor. Sys., 303 AD2d 437 [2003]).

Dillon, J.R, Dickerson, Leventhal and Austin, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.3d 496, 987 N.Y.S.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/archstone-v-tocci-building-corp-of-new-jersey-inc-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack