Archon Gaming Corp. v. Dist. Ct. (State, Dep't of Admin.)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 10, 2017·No. 72658·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ARCHON GAMING CORPORATION, No. 72658 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JAMES CROCKETT, MAY I DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION APPEALS OFFICE, AN AGENCY OF THE STATE OF NEVADA; SIERRA NEVADA ADMINISTRATORS; AND JAMES KELLY, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT RELIEF This original petition for a writ of certiorari, mandamus, or prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss and statistically close a workers' compensation petition for judicial review. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I907A rret 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas Alan R. Johns Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A ep.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Archon Gaming Corp. v. Dist. Ct. (State, Dep't of Admin.), (Neb. 2017).

Archon Gaming Corp. v. Dist. Ct. (State, Dep't of Admin.) (Archon Gaming Corp. v. Dist. Ct. (State, Dep't of Admin.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related