Architectural Builders, Inc. v. Ramirez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Architectural Builders, Inc. v. Ramirez

531 So. 2d 745, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2240, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4378

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 29, 1988

DocketNos. 88-0195, 88-0393

StatusPublished

This text of 531 So. 2d 745 (Architectural Builders, Inc. v. Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Architectural Builders, Inc. v. Ramirez, 531 So. 2d 745, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2240, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4378 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal of the deputy commissioner’s ruling awarding wage-loss benefits and setting claimant’s average weekly wage at $8.00 hourly, with 12 hours weekly overtime. Finding no competent, substantial evidence in the record to support a finding that claimant’s contract of hire or industry standards entitle claimant to 12 hours per week overtime, we reverse as to that portion of the award. On remand, the deputy is directed to calculate claimant’s average weekly wage at $8.00 per hour for 40 hours per week and determine a corresponding compensation rate.

BOOTH, SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal of the deputy commissioner’s ruling awarding wage-loss benefits and setting claimant’s average weekly wage at $8.00 hourly, with 12 hours weekly overtime. Finding no competent, substantial evidence in the record to support a finding that claimant’s contract of hire or industry standards entitle claimant to 12 hours per week overtime, we reverse as to that portion of the award. On remand, the deputy is directed to calculate claimant’s average weekly wage at $8.00 per hour for 40 hours per week and determine a corresponding compensation rate.

BOOTH, SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

531 So. 2d 745, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2240, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/architectural-builders-inc-v-ramirez-fladistctapp-1988.