Archie K. Babson v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Archie K. Babson v. United States

417 F.2d 1337

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 25, 1969

Docket23683_1

StatusPublished

This text of 417 F.2d 1337 (Archie K. Babson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Archie K. Babson v. United States, 417 F.2d 1337 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We are satisfied the district court was correct in that denial, and we affirm for the reason stated in the district court’s order, i. e., appellant’s failure to raise certain points on his appeal (cf. Babson v. United States, 330 F.2d 662 (9th Cir. 1964); and his failure to show prejudice by reason of any action or lack of action on the part of his attorney, whom he now criticizes.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We are satisfied the district court was correct in that denial, and we affirm for the reason stated in the district court’s order, i. e., appellant’s failure to raise certain points on his appeal (cf. Babson v. United States, 330 F.2d 662 (9th Cir. 1964); and his failure to show prejudice by reason of any action or lack of action on the part of his attorney, whom he now criticizes.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 F.2d 1337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/archie-k-babson-v-united-states-ca9-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack