Archibald v. Codd

New York Supreme Court

Archibald v. Codd

84 Misc. 2d 42, 375 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3086

New York Supreme Court·Decided October 24, 1975·Published

Opinion

Samuel A. Spiegel, J.

Application to direct the respondent to issue an on-premises pistol license is granted only to the extent of directing respondent to make a final determination on petitioner’s application within 45 days after service of a copy of the order to be settled hereon. It is clear that respondent has failed to act, although he has had a considerable period of time to máke a determination. In these circumstances, the court does not rule on whether the application should be granted, but only that a determination is required to be made within a reasonable time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samuel A. Spiegel, J.

Application to direct the respondent to issue an on-premises pistol license is granted only to the extent of directing respondent to make a final determination on petitioner’s application within 45 days after service of a copy of the order to be settled hereon. It is clear that respondent has failed to act, although he has had a considerable period of time to máke a determination. In these circumstances, the court does not rule on whether the application should be granted, but only that a determination is required to be made within a reasonable time.

Archibald v. Codd, 84 Misc. 2d 42, 375 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1975 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3086 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1975).

Pincite

84 Misc. 2d 42 (Archibald v. Codd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.