Archibald v. City of Niagara Falls
This text of 89 Misc. 2d 268 (Archibald v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears that an accident occurred on March 22, 1974 involving a then infant plaintiff, age 17, who had been born on April 14, 1956. It would appear that said plaintiff became 18 on April 14, 1974 and that the law of the State of New York moved the age of majority from 21 to 18 on September 1, 1974.
There appears to have been a timely notice served but that the action itself was not commenced before September of 1976, over one year and 90 days after the accident. The plaintiff contends that the said Joel Archibald was a minor when the accident occurred and that the subsequent statutory change should not apply to his cause of action.
It appears to this court that the said plaintiff was an adult when the statute was so changed on September 1, 1974, and well may have had a cause of action not barred by the statute for one year and 90 days after he so became an adult.
It is this court’s opinion that when the said Joel Archibald became an adult by statute on September 1, 1974, he was thereafter governed by the laws pertaining to adults and no longer had available to him the special protections afforded to minors (Atwell v Playland Rye Comm., 86 Misc 2d 13).
The requested motion to dismiss is granted, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 Misc. 2d 268, 391 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/archibald-v-city-of-niagara-falls-nysupct-1977.