Archer v. Napolitano
This text of Archer v. Napolitano (Archer v. Napolitano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOV 2 3 2010 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy ) Courts for the District of Columbia Phyllis J. Archer, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10 200·6 ) Janet Napolitano, ) ) Defendant. ) )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed
in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction.
Plaintiff, a resident of Arlington, Virginia, alleges that the Department of Homeland
Security "wrongfully terminated" her because she failed "to pay the agency Citibank credit
card[.]" Compl. at 1. Her recourse lies exclusively in the remedial scheme of the Civil Service
Reform Act of 1978, which requires adjudication of such claims by the Office of Personnel
Management, appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board and judicial review by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Fornaro v. James, 416 F.3d 63,66 (D.C. Cir. 2005).1
A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Date: November 2-0,2010
I Although plaintiff mentions the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, she does
not allege any facts to support a discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,42 U.S.c. §§ 2000e et seq.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Archer v. Napolitano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/archer-v-napolitano-dcd-2010.