Archer v. Greer

36 Ga. 107
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 36 Ga. 107 (Archer v. Greer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Archer v. Greer, 36 Ga. 107 (Ga. 1867).

Opinion

Harris, J.

The bill of exception alleges error in the circuit Judge, in refusing to allow him (defendant below,) to become, on his [108]*108own motion, a witness in his own behalf to support his plea of failure of consideration. Until the act of the Legislature of 1866, parties were not authorized to give testimony in their own behalf, and by it only in certain circumstances. The question here is, could Archer be a witness as the case was situated. The facts are, that Carver, to whom the note was made payable, and of whom the purchase of the fertilizer was made, is dead, — that Greer, the plaintiff in the suit, is his administrator. In a case thus situated, the surviving party is not allowed to testify for himself. The fact drawn out by the examination of Greer, that Carver was the agent of Wilcox & Co. of Augusta, to sell the guano for them, cannot change the rule — as Garner was an agent with a del-credere commission, and having taken the note payable to himself, he should be deemed, in giving a fair interpretation to the act of 1866, as an original party to the contract and competent to have testified, had he been alive.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brightwell v. Jordan
74 Ga. 486 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1885)
Bigham v. Coleman
71 Ga. 176 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Ga. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/archer-v-greer-ga-1867.