Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.

Fifth Circuit

Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.

647 F.3d 533, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14818, 2011 WL 2852627

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 597 F.3d 330 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 20, 2011·No. 08-11195·Published

Opinion

*534 PER CURIAM:

This court’s opinion denying class certification at 597 F.3d 330 has been vacated by the Supreme Court in Erica P. John Fund, Inc., f/k/a Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., et al, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2179, 180 L.Ed.2d 24 (2011), holding that plaintiff does not need to prove loss causation in order to obtain class certification.

Therefore the district court’s judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings or decision.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*534 PER CURIAM:

This court’s opinion denying class certification at 597 F.3d 330 has been vacated by the Supreme Court in Erica P. John Fund, Inc., f/k/a Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., et al, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2179, 180 L.Ed.2d 24 (2011), holding that plaintiff does not need to prove loss causation in order to obtain class certification.

Therefore the district court’s judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings or decision.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., 647 F.3d 533, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14818, 2011 WL 2852627 (5th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

647 F.3d 533 (Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related