Arch Specialty Insurance v. Hedrick
This text of 612 F. App'x 681 (Arch Specialty Insurance v. Hedrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Travis Hedrick appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Arch Specialty Insurance Company in this insurance case. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Arch Specialty Ins. Co. v. Hedrick, No. 1:13-cv-00621-TDS-JLW, 2014 WL 6627039 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2014); see also Britt v. Hayes, 142 N.C.App. 190, 541 S.E.2d 761, 762 (2001) (holding that claims of battery and negligence are compatible). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
612 F. App'x 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arch-specialty-insurance-v-hedrick-ca4-2015.