Arch Specialty Insurance v. Hedrick

612 F. App'x 681
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 2015
DocketNo. 14-2392
StatusPublished

This text of 612 F. App'x 681 (Arch Specialty Insurance v. Hedrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arch Specialty Insurance v. Hedrick, 612 F. App'x 681 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Travis Hedrick appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Arch Specialty Insurance Company in this insurance case. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Arch Specialty Ins. Co. v. Hedrick, No. 1:13-cv-00621-TDS-JLW, 2014 WL 6627039 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2014); see also Britt v. Hayes, 142 N.C.App. 190, 541 S.E.2d 761, 762 (2001) (holding that claims of battery and negligence are compatible). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Britt v. Hayes
541 S.E.2d 761 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
612 F. App'x 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arch-specialty-insurance-v-hedrick-ca4-2015.