Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Travis Hedrick

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 18, 2015
• Docket: 14-2392
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2392

ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRAVIS HEDRICK,

Defendant – Appellant,

and

TALLEY RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Inferno,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00621-TDS-JLW)

Submitted: July 31, 2015 Decided: August 18, 2015

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary K. Sue, Stephanie W. Anderson, BURTON, SUE & ANDERSON, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina; Douglas S. Harris, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Steven G. Janik, Crystal L. Maluchnik, JANIK L.L.P., Cleveland, Ohio; Lovic A. Brooks, III, JANIK L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina; Richard L. Pinto, PINTO COATES KYRE & BOWERS PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Travis Hedrick appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to Arch Specialty Insurance Company in this

insurance case. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the

record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Arch

Specialty Ins. Co. v. Hedrick, No. 1:13-cv-00621-TDS-JLW

(M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2014); see also Britt v. Hayes, 541 S.E.2d

761, 762 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001) (holding that claims of battery

and negligence are compatible). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED