Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp.

Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp.

977 So. 2d 953, 2008 WL 1727592
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 La. LEXIS 271 →
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 24, 2008·No. 2008-C-0053·Published

Opinion

977 So.2d 953 (2008)

Daniel ARCENEAUX, Louis Daverede, Jr., Vives Lemmon and Jules Menesses
v.
AMSTAR CORP., Amstar Sugar Corp., Tate and Lyle North American Sugars, Inc., and Domino Sugar Company.

No. 2008-C-0053.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 24, 2008.

In re Tate & Lyle North American Sugars Inc.; — Defendant; Applying for Writ *954 of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 86-959; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2006-CA-1592.

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant.

VICTORY, J., would grant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp., 977 So. 2d 953, 2008 WL 1727592 (La. 2008).

977 So. 2d 953 (Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.