Arcate v. Hole in Wall Gang, Ltd.

179 Misc. 2d 520, 686 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 32
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 5, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 Misc. 2d 520 (Arcate v. Hole in Wall Gang, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arcate v. Hole in Wall Gang, Ltd., 179 Misc. 2d 520, 686 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 32 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Final judgment and order unanimously reversed without costs and matter remanded to the Justice Court of the Town of Southampton for further proceedings.

Pursuant to New York Constitution, article VI, § 17, the Justice Court has only such jurisdiction as is prescribed by the Legislature. With respect to summary proceedings, the Legislature has prescribed that the Justice Court shall have jurisdiction over “proceedings to recover possession of real property located in whole or in part within the municipality” (UJCA 204). In light of these provisions, the Justice Court of the Town of Riverhead does not have jurisdiction over a summary proceeding to recover possession of real property which is located entirely within the Town of Southampton. Nor does the removal provision pursuant to which the proceeding was transferred (CPLR 325 [g]) confer any additional jurisdiction upon the transferee court. Accordingly, the order of the County Court transferring the proceeding from the Justice Court of the Town of Southampton to the Justice Court of the Town of Riverhead and the final judgment rendered by the Riverhead court must be reversed.

It is noted that UJCA 106 provides for the assignment of a Justice in the event of the absence or inability of the Town Justices.

DiPaola, P. J., Ingrassia and Levitt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burke v. Aspland
56 A.D.2d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 Misc. 2d 520, 686 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1999 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arcate-v-hole-in-wall-gang-ltd-nyappterm-1999.