Arcata Investment, Inc. v. Thomas

292 A.D.2d 408, 738 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2517

This text of 292 A.D.2d 408 (Arcata Investment, Inc. v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arcata Investment, Inc. v. Thomas, 292 A.D.2d 408, 738 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Aron Malik appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), dated July 12, 2000, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) for leave to serve a late answer and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion as he failed to provide a reasonable excuse for his delay in serving an answer (see, CPLR 3012 [d]; Genen v McElroy, 213 AD2d 511). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, O’Brien, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Genen v. McElroy
213 A.D.2d 511 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 A.D.2d 408, 738 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arcata-investment-inc-v-thomas-nyappdiv-2002.