Arcara v. Supreme Court
This text of 25 A.D.2d 877 (Arcara v. Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 CPLR, the petitioner seeks to: (1) enjoin respondents from conducting a retrial of petitioner under a certain indictment (trial of petitioner had ended in a mistrial) and (2) dismiss the indictment on the ground of double jeopardy. Application denied and proceeding dismissed, without costs. In our opinion, the granting of the mistrial on May 2, 1966 was not an improvident exereise of discretion. Under the circumstances, the plea of double jeopardy to prevent retrial of petitioner is not available (Gori v. United States, 367 U. S. 364).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 877, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arcara-v-supreme-court-nyappdiv-1966.