Arcanum Investigations, Inc. v. ChoicePoint Public Records, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Arcanum Investigations, Inc. v. ChoicePoint Public Records, Inc.

909 So. 2d 456, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13295, 2005 WL 2016817

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 2005

DocketNo. 4D04-3390

StatusPublished

This text of 909 So. 2d 456 (Arcanum Investigations, Inc. v. ChoicePoint Public Records, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arcanum Investigations, Inc. v. ChoicePoint Public Records, Inc., 909 So. 2d 456, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13295, 2005 WL 2016817 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of appel-lee, ChoieePoint Public Records, Inc., and against appellants, Arcanum Investigations, Inc., and DocuSearch, Inc., in a lawsuit alleging civil conspiracy, breach of contract, and fraud. After entry of summary judgment as to liability in favor of ChoieePoint, the trial court held a non-jury trial and found Arcanum and DocuSearch jointly and severally liable for compensatory damages in the amount of $67,561.19 and $500 in attorney’s fees. Additionally, the trial court found ChoieePoint failed to establish its claim for punitive damages, which is the basis for the cross-appeal. We find the evidence supported compensatory damages in the amount of only $67,086.16, but otherwise affirm the order on appeal.

We have considered the other arguments on appeal and cross-appeal, and find no error. Appellants did not object to the trial court’s proceeding on the issue of damages in the absence of a jury until the non-jury trial was well underway; such objection was simply too late to avoid waiver of the right to jury trial. See Del-Rena, Inc. v. KFM, Inc., 789 So.2d 897, 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (reaffirming principle that participation in non-jury trial without objection constitutes waiver of the right to jury trial) (citing Barth v. Fla. State Constructors Serv., Inc., 327 So.2d 13, 15 (Fla.1976)). Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for the trial court to amend the verdict consistent with this decision.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded.

STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of appel-lee, ChoieePoint Public Records, Inc., and against appellants, Arcanum Investigations, Inc., and DocuSearch, Inc., in a lawsuit alleging civil conspiracy, breach of contract, and fraud. After entry of summary judgment as to liability in favor of ChoieePoint, the trial court held a non-jury trial and found Arcanum and DocuSearch jointly and severally liable for compensatory damages in the amount of $67,561.19 and $500 in attorney’s fees. Additionally, the trial court found ChoieePoint failed to establish its claim for punitive damages, which is the basis for the cross-appeal. We find the evidence supported compensatory damages in the amount of only $67,086.16, but otherwise affirm the order on appeal.

We have considered the other arguments on appeal and cross-appeal, and find no error. Appellants did not object to the trial court’s proceeding on the issue of damages in the absence of a jury until the non-jury trial was well underway; such objection was simply too late to avoid waiver of the right to jury trial. See Del-Rena, Inc. v. KFM, Inc., 789 So.2d 897, 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (reaffirming principle that participation in non-jury trial without objection constitutes waiver of the right to jury trial) (citing Barth v. Fla. State Constructors Serv., Inc., 327 So.2d 13, 15 (Fla.1976)). Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for the trial court to amend the verdict consistent with this decision.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded.

STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

909 So. 2d 456, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13295, 2005 WL 2016817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arcanum-investigations-inc-v-choicepoint-public-records-inc-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack