Arcady Farms Milling Co. v. Stribling

91 S.E.2d 293, 93 Ga. App. 260
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 26, 1956
Docket35892
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E.2d 293 (Arcady Farms Milling Co. v. Stribling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arcady Farms Milling Co. v. Stribling, 91 S.E.2d 293, 93 Ga. App. 260 (Ga. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Gardner, P. J.

1. This case is a companion case to Arcady Farms Milling Co. v. Betts, ante. The first, third, and fourth special grounds of the two cases are identical and are controlled by the decision upon those points in that case; and, by virtue of the decision in division 3 of the opinion in that case, a reversal is required in this case.

2. The assignment of error in the second special ground to the effect that “the court erred in failing to charge on contributory negligence” is too vague and indefinite to present any question for decision by this court. Hudson v. State, 26 Ga. App. 596 (4) (107 S. E. 94).

3. The trial court erred in denying the motion for new trial for the reason stated in division 1.

Judgment reversed.

Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson v. State
107 S.E. 94 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E.2d 293, 93 Ga. App. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arcady-farms-milling-co-v-stribling-gactapp-1956.