A.R.C. v. State
777 So. 2d 1219, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3257, 2001 WL 246001
Opinion
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
As the State has agreed by confessing error, the adjudication of delinquency as to theft as charged in count III is vacated because it is improperly duplicative of the adjudication for strong-armed robbery of the same property as charged in count I. See Davis v. State, 775 So.2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Taylor v. State, 751 So.2d 659 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), review denied, 770 So.2d 161 (Fla.2000). The adjudication as to robbery is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
A.R.C. v. State, 777 So. 2d 1219, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3257, 2001 WL 246001 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
777 So. 2d 1219 (A.R.C. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
775 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Taylor v. State
751 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)