ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Properties

District Court of Appeal of Florida

ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Properties

746 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16269, 1999 WL 1111653

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 8, 1999·No. No. 98-02416·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ARC Foods, Inc. appeals the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to MGI Properties. At the time the award was entered, MGI was entitled to recover fees and costs as the prevailing party in the underlying litigation. However, we have since reversed the final judgment in favor of MGI and remanded for further proceedings in ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Properties, 724 So.2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Our reversal of the final judgment requires reversal of the “Supplement to Amended Judgment” in which the fees and costs were awarded. See Nathanson v. Houss, 717 So.2d 114, 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Reversed.

FULMER, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

ARC Foods, Inc. appeals the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees and costs to MGI Properties. At the time the award was entered, MGI was entitled to recover fees and costs as the prevailing party in the underlying litigation. However, we have since reversed the final judgment in favor of MGI and remanded for further proceedings in ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Properties, 724 So.2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Our reversal of the final judgment requires reversal of the “Supplement to Amended Judgment” in which the fees and costs were awarded. See Nathanson v. Houss, 717 So.2d 114, 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Reversed.

FULMER, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and GREEN, JJ., Concur.

ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Properties, 746 So. 2d 514, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16269, 1999 WL 1111653 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

746 So. 2d 514 (ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Properties) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related