Arbuthnot v. Kelley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Arbuthnot v. Kelley

162 N.W. 168, 165 Wis. 362, 1917 Wisc. LEXIS 85

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedApril 4, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 162 N.W. 168 (Arbuthnot v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arbuthnot v. Kelley, 162 N.W. 168, 165 Wis. 362, 1917 Wisc. LEXIS 85 (Wis. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, J.

Did the circuit court err in holding that Kelley did not violate sec. 4549, Stats. ? That must be answered in the affirmative, because the statute expressly makes such a transaction as he was guilty of a criminal offense. In Menasha W. W. Co. v. Winter, 159 Wis. 437, 150 N. W. 526, the court dealt with substantially such a matter and held that the transaction was “directly within the condemnation’ of the statute and the contract absolutely void.”

Was appellant guilty of fatal laches, barring him from prosecuting the action? That is ruled in the negative by Milwaukee v. Reiff, 157 Wis. 226, 146 N. W. 1130. It was there held that an action to recover, money paid out of the public treasury in violation of law cannot be successfully defended against on the ground of laches, within the equitable doctrine of Frederick v. Douglas Co. 96 Wis. 411, 71 N. W. 798. Such is the doctrine invoked by respondent here and which the circuit court supposed was applicable.

There cannot be such a thing as excusable violation of a criminal statute, such as the one involved here, on the ground of good faith or fatal laches, short of the limitation of the [364]*364written law, as to remedies for tlie wrong. If good faith, or mere delay, as in this case, in resorting to a remedy, conld he invoked to, in effect, change the title to money illegally obtained from a municipality therefrom to the wrongdoer, the legislative policy embodied in the written law could be easily set at naught by judicial administration. The remedy invoked here, while of an equitable nature, as regards appellant, is to enforce a legal liability to the town. The wrong which afforded appellant such a remedy, was the failure of the public officers to perform their duty.

By the Oourt. — The judgment is reversed, and the cause-remanded for judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against defendant Kelley for the benefit of the defendant town for $434.25 with interest thereon from the 1st day of December, 1914, and for judgment against said Kelley for plaintiff’s benefit for the costs and disbursements of the action. Costs, in this court are awarded to appellant against said Kelley.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, J.

Did the circuit court err in holding that Kelley did not violate sec. 4549, Stats. ? That must be answered in the affirmative, because the statute expressly makes such a transaction as he was guilty of a criminal offense. In Menasha W. W. Co. v. Winter, 159 Wis. 437, 150 N. W. 526, the court dealt with substantially such a matter and held that the transaction was “directly within the condemnation’ of the statute and the contract absolutely void.”

Was appellant guilty of fatal laches, barring him from prosecuting the action? That is ruled in the negative by Milwaukee v. Reiff, 157 Wis. 226, 146 N. W. 1130. It was there held that an action to recover, money paid out of the public treasury in violation of law cannot be successfully defended against on the ground of laches, within the equitable doctrine of Frederick v. Douglas Co. 96 Wis. 411, 71 N. W. 798. Such is the doctrine invoked by respondent here and which the circuit court supposed was applicable.

There cannot be such a thing as excusable violation of a criminal statute, such as the one involved here, on the ground of good faith or fatal laches, short of the limitation of the [364]*364written law, as to remedies for tlie wrong. If good faith, or mere delay, as in this case, in resorting to a remedy, conld he invoked to, in effect, change the title to money illegally obtained from a municipality therefrom to the wrongdoer, the legislative policy embodied in the written law could be easily set at naught by judicial administration. The remedy invoked here, while of an equitable nature, as regards appellant, is to enforce a legal liability to the town. The wrong which afforded appellant such a remedy, was the failure of the public officers to perform their duty.

By the Oourt. — The judgment is reversed, and the cause-remanded for judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against defendant Kelley for the benefit of the defendant town for $434.25 with interest thereon from the 1st day of December, 1914, and for judgment against said Kelley for plaintiff’s benefit for the costs and disbursements of the action. Costs, in this court are awarded to appellant against said Kelley.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 N.W. 168, 165 Wis. 362, 1917 Wisc. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arbuthnot-v-kelley-wis-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack