Arbuckle Bros. v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.

124 S.E. 78, 32 Ga. App. 495, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 494
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1924
Docket15584
StatusPublished

This text of 124 S.E. 78 (Arbuckle Bros. v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arbuckle Bros. v. Jaques & Tinsley Co., 124 S.E. 78, 32 Ga. App. 495, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 494 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, and especially by the answer of the trial magistrate to the petition for certiorari, it does nót appear that the judge of the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloockoortli, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 S.E. 78, 32 Ga. App. 495, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arbuckle-bros-v-jaques-tinsley-co-gactapp-1924.