Arbour Heights, Inc. v. Norman

39 A.D.2d 836, 333 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4442
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 1972·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly dismissed defendant’s complaint against Oliva who is plaintiff’s agent. Plaintiff is chargeable with the knowledge and conduct of his agent through whom he acted (Koslovki v. International Heater Co., 75 App. Div. 60, affd. 178 N. Y. 631). ¶ Proof of Oliva’s knowledge and conduct might defeat plaintiff’s claim against defendant but could not subject Oliva to third-party liability to defendant. Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. (30 N Y 2d 143) is not applicable. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term dismissing third-party complaint in negligence action.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arbour Heights, Inc. v. Norman, 39 A.D.2d 836, 333 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

39 A.D.2d 836 (Arbour Heights, Inc. v. Norman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co. v. Rosseel, N.V.
702 F. Supp. 1005 (S.D. New York, 1988)
Taft v. Shaffer Trucking, Inc.
52 A.D.2d 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)