Arbor Mfg. Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Arbor Mfg. Corp. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 574

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arbor Mfg. Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 663 →

United States Customs Court·Decided February 25, 1960·No. Reap. Dec. 9603; Entry No. 863278-1/2, etc.·Published

Opinion

Mollison, Judge:

When the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule were called for trial, counsel for the [575]*575parties submitted them for decision upon agreed facts on the basis of which I find that the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved is export value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, and that such value in each case is the appraised value, less the item of commission as and where it appears on each invoice, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mollison, Judge:

When the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule were called for trial, counsel for the [575]*575parties submitted them for decision upon agreed facts on the basis of which I find that the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved is export value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, and that such value in each case is the appraised value, less the item of commission as and where it appears on each invoice, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Arbor Mfg. Corp. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 574 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

44 Cust. Ct. 574 (Arbor Mfg. Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.