Arboleya v. Boring

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Arboleya v. Boring

770 So. 2d 1278, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14902, 2000 WL 1700860

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 15, 2000

DocketNo. 3D00-1703

StatusPublished

This text of 770 So. 2d 1278 (Arboleya v. Boring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arboleya v. Boring, 770 So. 2d 1278, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14902, 2000 WL 1700860 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an attempt to simplify the issues for trial in this cause, the plaintiffs below, Alan Boring and Shirley Boring, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. See Bakker v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Hammonton, New Jersey, 575 So.2d 222, 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)(“[T]he purpose of the partial summary judgment procedure is to narrow the issues in a case so as to limit the matters genuinely in dispute which must be taken to trial.”). The net effect, however, has been to further complicate this matter. Because there are genuine issues of material fact to be resolved in the upcoming trial as it relates to the trial court’s order granting the motion for partial summary judgment dated May 26, 2000, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In an attempt to simplify the issues for trial in this cause, the plaintiffs below, Alan Boring and Shirley Boring, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. See Bakker v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Hammonton, New Jersey, 575 So.2d 222, 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)(“[T]he purpose of the partial summary judgment procedure is to narrow the issues in a case so as to limit the matters genuinely in dispute which must be taken to trial.”). The net effect, however, has been to further complicate this matter. Because there are genuine issues of material fact to be resolved in the upcoming trial as it relates to the trial court’s order granting the motion for partial summary judgment dated May 26, 2000, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

770 So. 2d 1278, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14902, 2000 WL 1700860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arboleya-v-boring-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack