Arboleya v. Boring

770 So. 2d 1278, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14902, 2000 WL 1700860
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2000·No. No. 3D00-1703·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an attempt to simplify the issues for trial in this cause, the plaintiffs below, Alan Boring and Shirley Boring, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. See Bakker v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Hammonton, New Jersey, 575 So.2d 222, 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)(“[T]he purpose of the partial summary judgment procedure is to narrow the issues in a case so as to limit the matters genuinely in dispute which must be taken to trial.”). The net effect, however, has been to further complicate this matter. Because there are genuine issues of material fact to be resolved in the upcoming trial as it relates to the trial court’s order granting the motion for partial summary judgment dated May 26, 2000, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arboleya v. Boring, 770 So. 2d 1278, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14902, 2000 WL 1700860 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

770 So. 2d 1278 (Arboleya v. Boring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bakker v. FIRST FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N OF HAMMONTON, NJ
575 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)