Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson

852 N.E.2d 1212, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1462

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 23, 2006

Docket2006-1212

StatusPublished

This text of 852 N.E.2d 1212 (Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson, 852 N.E.2d 1212, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1462 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Certified Question of State Law, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, No. 3:06 CV 40010. On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6). The court will answer the following questions:

1. “Is Ohio Revised Code {2315.18, as amended by Senate Bill 80, effective, April 7, 2005, unconstitutional on the grounds as stated by the Plaintiffs?”

3. “Is Ohio Revised Code {2315.20, as amended by Senate Bill 80, effective, April 7, 2005, unconstitutional on the grounds as stated by the Plaintiffs?”

4. “Is Ohio Revised Code {2315.21, as amended by Senate Bill 80, effective, April 7, 2005, unconstitutional on the grounds as stated by the Plaintiffs?”

O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., would also answer the second certified question. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Resnick, J., not participating.

On motion for admission pro hac vice of Robert S. Peck and Stephen B. Pershing by Janet G. Abaray. Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI