Arbeiter v. Bigelow, No. Cv91 028 91 82 (Mar. 20, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Arbeiter v. Bigelow, No. Cv91 028 91 82 (Mar. 20, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2009

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 20, 1995

DocketNo. CV91 028 91 82

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2009 (Arbeiter v. Bigelow, No. Cv91 028 91 82 (Mar. 20, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arbeiter v. Bigelow, No. Cv91 028 91 82 (Mar. 20, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2009 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. 131 The motion is denied. The defendant's rely, inter alia, upon deposition testimony in support of their motion.

"The primary purpose of a deposition taken pursuant to [the Practice Book rules] is discovery. . . . A response to a question propounded in a deposition is not a judicial admission. General Statutes § 52-200. At trial, in open court, the testimony [of the witness] may contradict her earlier statement [made at the deposition] and a question for the jury to decide may then emerge" Esposito v.Wethered, 4 Conn. App. 641, 645.

LAWRENCE L. HAUSER, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. 131 The motion is denied. The defendant's rely, inter alia, upon deposition testimony in support of their motion.

"The primary purpose of a deposition taken pursuant to [the Practice Book rules] is discovery. . . . A response to a question propounded in a deposition is not a judicial admission. General Statutes § 52-200. At trial, in open court, the testimony [of the witness] may contradict her earlier statement [made at the deposition] and a question for the jury to decide may then emerge" Esposito v.Wethered, 4 Conn. App. 641, 645.

LAWRENCE L. HAUSER, JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arbeiter-v-bigelow-no-cv91-028-91-82-mar-20-1995-connsuperct-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack