Arbaugh v. A.G. Processing, Inc.

191 S.W.3d 539, 358 Ark. 432
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 16, 2004
Docket04-682
StatusPublished

This text of 191 S.W.3d 539 (Arbaugh v. A.G. Processing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arbaugh v. A.G. Processing, Inc., 191 S.W.3d 539, 358 Ark. 432 (Ark. 2004).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Kirby Arbaugh, has tendered a petition am. review from a 6-3 court of appeals’ decision affirming the workers’ compensation commission. In his petition, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

We grant appellant’s petition. In granting this petition for review, we note that appellee contends that the petition for review was not timely filed. We disagree. The petition was timely tendered to our clerk for filing on June 18, 2004. The filing fee was not paid until June 23, 2004.

In D.B. Griffin Warehouse, Inc. v. Sanders, 336 Ark. 264, 986 S.W.2d 835 (1999), we endorsed the practice of the clerk’s office to accept records as timely filed when the records are tendered on time and when the filing fee is subsequently paid. We stated that “[i]n such cases, the date of tender becomes the date of filing, and the record is marked filed as of that date.” Id.

In this case, the file-stamp should reflect the date that the petition was tendered, which is June 18, 2004. Accordingly, we conclude that the petition for review was timely filed.

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D.B. Griffin Warehouse, Inc. v. Sanders
986 S.W.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 S.W.3d 539, 358 Ark. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arbaugh-v-ag-processing-inc-ark-2004.