Arbaugh v. A.G. Processing, Inc.

191 S.W.3d 539, 358 Ark. 432
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arbaugh v. A.G. Processing, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 360 Ark. 491
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 16, 2004·No. 04-682·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Kirby Arbaugh, has tendered a petition am. review from a 6-3 court of appeals’ decision affirming the workers’ compensation commission. In his petition, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

We grant appellant’s petition. In granting this petition for review, we note that appellee contends that the petition for review was not timely filed. We disagree. The petition was timely tendered to our clerk for filing on June 18, 2004. The filing fee was not paid until June 23, 2004.

In D.B. Griffin Warehouse, Inc. v. Sanders, 336 Ark. 264, 986 S.W.2d 835 (1999), we endorsed the practice of the clerk’s office to accept records as timely filed when the records are tendered on time and when the filing fee is subsequently paid. We stated that “[i]n such cases, the date of tender becomes the date of filing, and the record is marked filed as of that date.” Id.

In this case, the file-stamp should reflect the date that the petition was tendered, which is June 18, 2004. Accordingly, we conclude that the petition for review was timely filed.

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arbaugh v. A.G. Processing, Inc., 191 S.W.3d 539, 358 Ark. 432 (Ark. 2004).

191 S.W.3d 539 (Arbaugh v. A.G. Processing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D.B. Griffin Warehouse, Inc. v. Sanders
986 S.W.2d 835 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)