Araujo v. Elkahlaoui
68 A.D.3d 1030, 890 N.Y.2d 348
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In response to the plaintiffs demonstration of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, the defendants failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Dillon, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Hall, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Araujo v. Elkahlaoui, 68 A.D.3d 1030, 890 N.Y.2d 348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 1030 (Araujo v. Elkahlaoui) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Posada v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
70 A.D.3d 1019 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)