Aratari v. Chrysler Corp.
This text of 25 A.D.2d 605 (Aratari v. Chrysler Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: In affirming we do not necessarily adopt all of the views set forth in the memorandum of Special Term. The pleading, however, was properly dismissed with leave to replead. (Cf. Wolfson v. Mandell, 13 A D 2d 760, affd. 11 N Y 2d 704.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting summary judgment in favor of defendants with leave to serve amended complaint.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 605, 269 N.Y.S.2d 387, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aratari-v-chrysler-corp-nyappdiv-1966.