Arastra Limited Partnership v. City of Palo Alto

417 F. Supp. 1125, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14298
District Court, N.D. California·Decided July 1, 1976·No. C-72-2305 RHS·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER VACATING AND SETTING ASIDE DECISION

SCHNACKE, District Judge.

Pursuant to stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ordered that the pleadings herein are withdrawn and that the Decision of the Court filed herein on September 15, 1975, and reported in 401 F.Supp. 962 be, and the same hereby is, vacated, set aside, and expunged.

It is further ordered that the foregoing portions of this Order be published in the Federal Supplement.

This Order shall not be effective until a dismissal with prejudice is signed by counsel for both parties and filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arastra Limited Partnership v. City of Palo Alto, 417 F. Supp. 1125, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14298 (N.D. Cal. 1976).

417 F. Supp. 1125 (Arastra Limited Partnership v. City of Palo Alto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Knudsen v. Commissioner
1980 T.C. Memo. 216 (U.S. Tax Court, 1980)
Frisco Land & Mining Co. v. State of California
74 Cal. App. 3d 736 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)