Arao v. Policy Holders Life Insurance

132 Cal. App. 785
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 2, 1933
DocketCiv. No. 4787
StatusPublished

This text of 132 Cal. App. 785 (Arao v. Policy Holders Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arao v. Policy Holders Life Insurance, 132 Cal. App. 785 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

MILLER, J., pro tem.

This case presents the same facts and the same questions of law that are presented in the case of Kiku Saito v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Assn., this day decided by this court (ante, p. 412 [22 Pac. (2d) 724]), except as to the name of the plaintiff and the dates of the transactions involved; and, for like reasons as in that ease given, the order denying a change of venue is affirmed.

Thompson, J., and Pullen, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kiku Saito v. Policy Holders L. Ins. Assn.
22 P.2d 724 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 Cal. App. 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arao-v-policy-holders-life-insurance-calctapp-1933.