Arao v. Policy Holders Life Insurance

132 Cal. App. 785
California Court of Appeal·Decided June 2, 1933·No. Civ. No. 4787·Published

Opinion

MILLER, J., pro tem.

This case presents the same facts and the same questions of law that are presented in the case of Kiku Saito v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Assn., this day decided by this court (ante, p. 412 [22 Pac. (2d) 724]), except as to the name of the plaintiff and the dates of the transactions involved; and, for like reasons as in that ease given, the order denying a change of venue is affirmed.

Thompson, J., and Pullen, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arao v. Policy Holders Life Insurance, 132 Cal. App. 785 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

132 Cal. App. 785 (Arao v. Policy Holders Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kiku Saito v. Policy Holders L. Ins. Assn.
22 P.2d 724 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)